The exhibition explores the profound cultural changes of the sixties in America through a surrealist style. The diverse array of artists offers many perspectives on topics like the Civil Rights Movement, space exploration, war, and feminist sexual revolutions.
Particularly interesting was Luchita Hurtado's Untitled, 1971. The painting shows a nude female figure looking down at an apple with a chevron pattern behind it. The painting places the audience as the figure, inviting them to be part of the work and feel a stronger connection to it, though the meaning remains ambiguous. The apple captivates the eye, almost central to the piece, and vibrates against the intense blue background. While not explicitly stated, one can assume this work was made in support of the feminist revolution.
Similar to Hurtado's piece, most of the work featured in the exhibition captures viewers' attention and raises awareness of the social issues of the time. Each section echoes the "unreal" feeling that surrealism pushes: first, three large camels greet you at the entrance; then, a dark room filled with psychosexual work; then more structural work; followed by political and feminist work. The floor plan and layout of the exhibition can feel disorienting, and the deep purple and vibrant orange chosen for some walls add to the "unreal" feeling. However, I did appreciate the exhibition's approach in showing parts of history in a modern way.
While there were various takes on surrealism, it was interesting to see artists' voices united by the liberating style.
The article successfully introduces the essential themes of the gallery, dividing the categories of surrealism as commentaries of the Civil Rights Movement, space exploration, war, and feminist sexual revolutions. In addition, the reflection of Luchita Hurtado's work is thorough and well-written, however I feel that it takes up writing space that could be dedicated to critiquing other important areas of the gallery. I wish the article expanded further on the way museum curators chose to unite such a diverse scope of projects. The Whitney's design choices play a major role in sorting and presenting the collection of work, so referencing more about the gallery experience would strengthen the critique.
ReplyDeleteI really appreciate your description of the gallery, and how the exhibition walls and general arrangement compliments or compares to the themes of the show. I think your take on Luchita Hurtado's painting is unique and really specific, however, I agree that it could be a bit shorter, given the amount of space it takes up in your review. It would also be interesting to mention other relevant artist's displayed in the show, which have pieces that strongly show the categories you reference (ie. surrealism, civil rights movement, space exploration, etc). This would give the reader a more holistic experience of the exhibition.
ReplyDelete